Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that in CIRP applications under Section 7 or Section 10 of the IBC the resolution professional proposed by the applicant must be appointed as IRP unless a disciplinary proceeding is pending against the proposed RP; the NCLT lacks discretion to substitute its own choice of IRP for reasons other than a pending disciplinary proceeding. The impugned NCLT order replacing the applicant's proposed IRP is set aside. The matter is remitted to the NCLT to grant fresh orders on the application filed by the respondent, in accordance with the statutory scheme and principles of natural justice, within six weeks of receipt of this judgment. Petition allowed.
The HC held that in CIRP applications under Section 7 or Section 10 of the IBC the resolution professional proposed by the applicant must be appointed as IRP unless a disciplinary proceeding is pending against the proposed RP; the NCLT lacks discretion to substitute its own choice of IRP for reasons other than a pending disciplinary proceeding. The impugned NCLT order replacing the applicant's proposed IRP is set aside. The matter is remitted to the NCLT to grant fresh orders on the application filed by the respondent, in accordance with the statutory scheme and principles of natural justice, within six weeks of receipt of this judgment. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.