Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
High Court allows the petition, sets aside the Addl. Sess. J.'s order dismissing the complaint and restores the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The HC holds that service by sending the statutory notice to the address derived from the accused's Aadhaar was lawful, and the envelope's return marked "left address" does not vitiate the complainant's case where the complaint pleads deliberate avoidance of service. The Revisional Court's contrary interpretation is disturbed; the HC concludes Section 138(b) requirements were complied with and that "receipt of the notice" is a phrase used for limitation computation, not an onerous proof of personal service. Sufficient material existed to issue process.
High Court allows the petition, sets aside the Addl. Sess. J.'s order dismissing the complaint and restores the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The HC holds that service by sending the statutory notice to the address derived from the accused's Aadhaar was lawful, and the envelope's return marked "left address" does not vitiate the complainant's case where the complaint pleads deliberate avoidance of service. The Revisional Court's contrary interpretation is disturbed; the HC concludes Section 138(b) requirements were complied with and that "receipt of the notice" is a phrase used for limitation computation, not an onerous proof of personal service. Sufficient material existed to issue process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
