Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
High Court allows the petition, sets aside the Addl. Sess. J.'s order dismissing the complaint and restores the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The HC holds that service by sending the statutory notice to the address derived from the accused's Aadhaar was lawful, and the envelope's return marked "left address" does not vitiate the complainant's case where the complaint pleads deliberate avoidance of service. The Revisional Court's contrary interpretation is disturbed; the HC concludes Section 138(b) requirements were complied with and that "receipt of the notice" is a phrase used for limitation computation, not an onerous proof of personal service. Sufficient material existed to issue process.
High Court allows the petition, sets aside the Addl. Sess. J.'s order dismissing the complaint and restores the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The HC holds that service by sending the statutory notice to the address derived from the accused's Aadhaar was lawful, and the envelope's return marked "left address" does not vitiate the complainant's case where the complaint pleads deliberate avoidance of service. The Revisional Court's contrary interpretation is disturbed; the HC concludes Section 138(b) requirements were complied with and that "receipt of the notice" is a phrase used for limitation computation, not an onerous proof of personal service. Sufficient material existed to issue process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
