Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The HC upheld that consolidation of a single show cause notice for multiple assessment years is permissible where the primary allegation is fraudulent availing of input tax credit, as alleged against the Petitioner concerning ITC exceeding Rs. 41 crores. Noting that the primary legal issue aligns with precedent, the Court declined extraordinary relief and disposed of the petition, observing that the impugned order is appealable under Section 107, CGST Act, 2017. The Petitioner was afforded liberty to institute an appeal by 30 September 2025 subject to filing the statutory appeal and making the requisite pre-deposits as mandated by the appellate provisions.
The HC upheld that consolidation of a single show cause notice for multiple assessment years is permissible where the primary allegation is fraudulent availing of input tax credit, as alleged against the Petitioner concerning ITC exceeding Rs. 41 crores. Noting that the primary legal issue aligns with precedent, the Court declined extraordinary relief and disposed of the petition, observing that the impugned order is appealable under Section 107, CGST Act, 2017. The Petitioner was afforded liberty to institute an appeal by 30 September 2025 subject to filing the statutory appeal and making the requisite pre-deposits as mandated by the appellate provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
