Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC upheld that consolidation of a single show cause notice for multiple assessment years is permissible where the primary allegation is fraudulent availing of input tax credit, as alleged against the Petitioner concerning ITC exceeding Rs. 41 crores. Noting that the primary legal issue aligns with precedent, the Court declined extraordinary relief and disposed of the petition, observing that the impugned order is appealable under Section 107, CGST Act, 2017. The Petitioner was afforded liberty to institute an appeal by 30 September 2025 subject to filing the statutory appeal and making the requisite pre-deposits as mandated by the appellate provisions.
The HC upheld that consolidation of a single show cause notice for multiple assessment years is permissible where the primary allegation is fraudulent availing of input tax credit, as alleged against the Petitioner concerning ITC exceeding Rs. 41 crores. Noting that the primary legal issue aligns with precedent, the Court declined extraordinary relief and disposed of the petition, observing that the impugned order is appealable under Section 107, CGST Act, 2017. The Petitioner was afforded liberty to institute an appeal by 30 September 2025 subject to filing the statutory appeal and making the requisite pre-deposits as mandated by the appellate provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
