Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC set aside the impugned orders of the Appellate Authority and the GST Department insofar as they retrospectively cancelled the petitioner's GST registration, holding that the orders manifest a complete non-application of mind; the court found that the petitioner had sought cancellation yet a retrospective cancellation w.e.f. 15 June 2019 was impermissible where the SCN did not contemplate retrospective effect. The HC directed that the petitioner's cancellation application dated 30 March 2021 and the SCN dated 9 April 2021 be adjudicated afresh and comprehensively by the GST Department. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
The HC set aside the impugned orders of the Appellate Authority and the GST Department insofar as they retrospectively cancelled the petitioner's GST registration, holding that the orders manifest a complete non-application of mind; the court found that the petitioner had sought cancellation yet a retrospective cancellation w.e.f. 15 June 2019 was impermissible where the SCN did not contemplate retrospective effect. The HC directed that the petitioner's cancellation application dated 30 March 2021 and the SCN dated 9 April 2021 be adjudicated afresh and comprehensively by the GST Department. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.