Pre-enactment land-sale agreements escape stamp-duty value substitution where substantial banking-channel consideration was received before Section 43...
Customs valuation and classification require comparable evidence and assessment of imported goods in their actual condition, invalidating related pena...
HC dismissed the writ challenge and disposed of the petition, holding that writ jurisdiction is inappropriate where multiple impugned adjudication orders involve numerous noticees and differing factual matrices requiring detailed factual inquiry. The HC held that the proper officer cannot be fixed based solely on the Petitioner's position and that the Petitioner's contentions may be ventilated in statutory appeals under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The Petitioner was granted leave to file six separate appeals against the impugned orders, subject to a pre-deposit requirement limited to the order dated 28 January 2025 (total demand Rs. 15,90,84,564; tax Rs. 7,95,42,282). Appeals and pre-deposit to be filed by 30 September 2025.
HC dismissed the writ challenge and disposed of the petition, holding that writ jurisdiction is inappropriate where multiple impugned adjudication orders involve numerous noticees and differing factual matrices requiring detailed factual inquiry. The HC held that the proper officer cannot be fixed based solely on the Petitioner's position and that the Petitioner's contentions may be ventilated in statutory appeals under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The Petitioner was granted leave to file six separate appeals against the impugned orders, subject to a pre-deposit requirement limited to the order dated 28 January 2025 (total demand Rs. 15,90,84,564; tax Rs. 7,95,42,282). Appeals and pre-deposit to be filed by 30 September 2025.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
