Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The HC, in a challenge to a best-judgment assessment under s.62 of the GST Act, held that s.62(2) operates to deem any order under s.62(1) withdrawn where the registered person furnishes valid returns within 30 days of service of the assessment and pays the tax and late fee; compliance here meant the assessment dated 07.02.2024 is deemed withdrawn and cannot form the basis for tax collection. The writ petition was disposed of by setting aside the assessment dated 07.02.2024. The ruling also clarifies no requirement of separate intimation to the proper officer for the deeming clause to operate and leaves it open to the 2nd Respondent to initiate assessment steps if deemed necessary.
The HC, in a challenge to a best-judgment assessment under s.62 of the GST Act, held that s.62(2) operates to deem any order under s.62(1) withdrawn where the registered person furnishes valid returns within 30 days of service of the assessment and pays the tax and late fee; compliance here meant the assessment dated 07.02.2024 is deemed withdrawn and cannot form the basis for tax collection. The writ petition was disposed of by setting aside the assessment dated 07.02.2024. The ruling also clarifies no requirement of separate intimation to the proper officer for the deeming clause to operate and leaves it open to the 2nd Respondent to initiate assessment steps if deemed necessary.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
