Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held the petition non-maintainable insofar as an alternative remedy existed, noting the petitioner should have appealed under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Tax Enactments, 2017 within three months of the impugned order (deadline 23.06.2025), and that the impugned order failed to consider the petitioner's reply, raising natural justice concerns. Exercising discretion, the Court conferred liberty to the petitioner to institute a statutory appeal before the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (GST) within 15 days of receipt of this order. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (GST) was suo motu impleaded as second respondent and the registry was directed to amend the cause title. Petition disposed.
The HC held the petition non-maintainable insofar as an alternative remedy existed, noting the petitioner should have appealed under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Tax Enactments, 2017 within three months of the impugned order (deadline 23.06.2025), and that the impugned order failed to consider the petitioner's reply, raising natural justice concerns. Exercising discretion, the Court conferred liberty to the petitioner to institute a statutory appeal before the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (GST) within 15 days of receipt of this order. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (GST) was suo motu impleaded as second respondent and the registry was directed to amend the cause title. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
