Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held the petition non-maintainable insofar as an alternative remedy existed, noting the petitioner should have appealed under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Tax Enactments, 2017 within three months of the impugned order (deadline 23.06.2025), and that the impugned order failed to consider the petitioner's reply, raising natural justice concerns. Exercising discretion, the Court conferred liberty to the petitioner to institute a statutory appeal before the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (GST) within 15 days of receipt of this order. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (GST) was suo motu impleaded as second respondent and the registry was directed to amend the cause title. Petition disposed.
The HC held the petition non-maintainable insofar as an alternative remedy existed, noting the petitioner should have appealed under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Tax Enactments, 2017 within three months of the impugned order (deadline 23.06.2025), and that the impugned order failed to consider the petitioner's reply, raising natural justice concerns. Exercising discretion, the Court conferred liberty to the petitioner to institute a statutory appeal before the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (GST) within 15 days of receipt of this order. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (GST) was suo motu impleaded as second respondent and the registry was directed to amend the cause title. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
