Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The HC held the petition non-maintainable insofar as an alternative remedy existed, noting the petitioner should have appealed under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Tax Enactments, 2017 within three months of the impugned order (deadline 23.06.2025), and that the impugned order failed to consider the petitioner's reply, raising natural justice concerns. Exercising discretion, the Court conferred liberty to the petitioner to institute a statutory appeal before the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (GST) within 15 days of receipt of this order. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (GST) was suo motu impleaded as second respondent and the registry was directed to amend the cause title. Petition disposed.
The HC held the petition non-maintainable insofar as an alternative remedy existed, noting the petitioner should have appealed under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Tax Enactments, 2017 within three months of the impugned order (deadline 23.06.2025), and that the impugned order failed to consider the petitioner's reply, raising natural justice concerns. Exercising discretion, the Court conferred liberty to the petitioner to institute a statutory appeal before the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (GST) within 15 days of receipt of this order. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (GST) was suo motu impleaded as second respondent and the registry was directed to amend the cause title. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
