Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the suo motu rectification order passed under s.154 by CPC/AO, holding it void for want of a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee as mandated by s.154(3) and the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal noted the return had not been processed under s.143(1), and the revenue produced no record of any opportunity afforded. Consequently the rectification, which had the effect of enhancing assessment, was quashed for non-compliance with statutory procedure and audi alteram partem requirements, and remitted for fresh action conforming to s.154(3) and fair hearing standards.
ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the suo motu rectification order passed under s.154 by CPC/AO, holding it void for want of a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee as mandated by s.154(3) and the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal noted the return had not been processed under s.143(1), and the revenue produced no record of any opportunity afforded. Consequently the rectification, which had the effect of enhancing assessment, was quashed for non-compliance with statutory procedure and audi alteram partem requirements, and remitted for fresh action conforming to s.154(3) and fair hearing standards.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.