Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the penalty under section 271E for alleged contravention of s.269T is time-barred and therefore quashed. The Tribunal found that an order under s.143(3) was passed on 02/05/2017, making the relevant assessment year end 31/03/2018 and the six-month period from the month of initiation expire on 30/11/2017, fixing the limitation to 31/03/2018. Even if the s.263 order dated 08/03/2021 is taken for limitation reckoning, the six-month period expired on 30/09/2021 and the limitation would be 31/03/2021. The impugned penalty dated 31/08/2022 exceeded the period prescribed by s.275(1) and was quashed; appeal of the assessee allowed.
ITAT held that the penalty under section 271E for alleged contravention of s.269T is time-barred and therefore quashed. The Tribunal found that an order under s.143(3) was passed on 02/05/2017, making the relevant assessment year end 31/03/2018 and the six-month period from the month of initiation expire on 30/11/2017, fixing the limitation to 31/03/2018. Even if the s.263 order dated 08/03/2021 is taken for limitation reckoning, the six-month period expired on 30/09/2021 and the limitation would be 31/03/2021. The impugned penalty dated 31/08/2022 exceeded the period prescribed by s.275(1) and was quashed; appeal of the assessee allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.