Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT held the Section 9 application maintainable. The Tribunal found the alleged pre-existing dispute on goods' quality was not established so as to attract Section 10A exclusion, since samples were drawn per the contractually prescribed procedure and testing was to be undertaken at the supplier's designated lab (or third-party) notwithstanding the Respondent's contrary assertion. The onus lay on the Respondent to appoint a representative at sampling; absence of such representation did not vitiate the sampling or testing process. Clause 4 established the supplied coal fell outside acceptable calorific parameters, supporting the Applicant's claim. Consequently, interlocutory remedy under Section 9 was held competent to proceed.
NCLAT held the Section 9 application maintainable. The Tribunal found the alleged pre-existing dispute on goods' quality was not established so as to attract Section 10A exclusion, since samples were drawn per the contractually prescribed procedure and testing was to be undertaken at the supplier's designated lab (or third-party) notwithstanding the Respondent's contrary assertion. The onus lay on the Respondent to appoint a representative at sampling; absence of such representation did not vitiate the sampling or testing process. Clause 4 established the supplied coal fell outside acceptable calorific parameters, supporting the Applicant's claim. Consequently, interlocutory remedy under Section 9 was held competent to proceed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
