Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that s.195 ordinarily applies where a resident pays a non-resident, but on facts the Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the assessee's own case (AY 2008-09) applying the DTAA Articles limiting tax on interest to 10% and treating the payment as chargeable; the AO disallowed interest under s.40(a)(i) for failure to deduct tax under s.195 and the CIT(A) confirmed that disallowance. Having no contrary binding view, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee's grounds, upheld the s.40(a)(i) disallowance and affirmed the liability of the assessee to deduct TDS on the interest payment.
ITAT held that s.195 ordinarily applies where a resident pays a non-resident, but on facts the Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the assessee's own case (AY 2008-09) applying the DTAA Articles limiting tax on interest to 10% and treating the payment as chargeable; the AO disallowed interest under s.40(a)(i) for failure to deduct tax under s.195 and the CIT(A) confirmed that disallowance. Having no contrary binding view, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee's grounds, upheld the s.40(a)(i) disallowance and affirmed the liability of the assessee to deduct TDS on the interest payment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.