Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
AAR held that the Applicant is not a "Promoter" and therefore does not fall within Notification No. 7/2019-CT(Rate); the goods received (M-sand, P-sand, blue metal, boulders, hollow bricks) from unregistered suppliers are neither notified under section 9(3) nor does the Applicant's activity fall within the scope of section 9(4). Consequently, the Applicant is not liable to discharge tax under the reverse charge mechanism on purchases of those goods from unregistered persons.
AAR held that the Applicant is not a "Promoter" and therefore does not fall within Notification No. 7/2019-CT(Rate); the goods received (M-sand, P-sand, blue metal, boulders, hollow bricks) from unregistered suppliers are neither notified under section 9(3) nor does the Applicant's activity fall within the scope of section 9(4). Consequently, the Applicant is not liable to discharge tax under the reverse charge mechanism on purchases of those goods from unregistered persons.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
