Incomplete BIS testing cannot justify reclassification or confiscatory action; declared customs classification restored and enhanced redemption fine s...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AAR held that the Applicant is not a "Promoter" and therefore does not fall within Notification No. 7/2019-CT(Rate); the goods received (M-sand, P-sand, blue metal, boulders, hollow bricks) from unregistered suppliers are neither notified under section 9(3) nor does the Applicant's activity fall within the scope of section 9(4). Consequently, the Applicant is not liable to discharge tax under the reverse charge mechanism on purchases of those goods from unregistered persons.
AAR held that the Applicant is not a "Promoter" and therefore does not fall within Notification No. 7/2019-CT(Rate); the goods received (M-sand, P-sand, blue metal, boulders, hollow bricks) from unregistered suppliers are neither notified under section 9(3) nor does the Applicant's activity fall within the scope of section 9(4). Consequently, the Applicant is not liable to discharge tax under the reverse charge mechanism on purchases of those goods from unregistered persons.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
