Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that the impugned transfer pricing adjustment was applied to the petitioner's entire turnover/operating costs rather than being confined to international/related-party transactions, which is contrary to settled law. The petitioner may press all available submissions before the CIT(A) in the pending statutory appeal; the CIT(A) is directed to decide the appeal expeditiously, preferably within 12 months. Pending disposal of the appeal and for four weeks thereafter, the Revenue is restrained from recovering taxes and interest attributable to the excess transfer pricing adjustment (≈ Rs.11,55,90,71,049 or as correctly computed) and from taking further proceedings on that specific issue. Stay applications on other additions to be decided by the Principal Commissioner in accordance with law.
The HC held that the impugned transfer pricing adjustment was applied to the petitioner's entire turnover/operating costs rather than being confined to international/related-party transactions, which is contrary to settled law. The petitioner may press all available submissions before the CIT(A) in the pending statutory appeal; the CIT(A) is directed to decide the appeal expeditiously, preferably within 12 months. Pending disposal of the appeal and for four weeks thereafter, the Revenue is restrained from recovering taxes and interest attributable to the excess transfer pricing adjustment (≈ Rs.11,55,90,71,049 or as correctly computed) and from taking further proceedings on that specific issue. Stay applications on other additions to be decided by the Principal Commissioner in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.