Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and remitted the matter to the file of the ld. AO for fresh adjudication on whether the derivative trades satisfy the conditions of Explanations 1 & 2 to s.43(5). The Tribunal noted absence of stamped contract notes and disputed broker account statements, lack of evidence that impounded digital copies contained complete contract notes, and unproduced s.133(6) enquiry results, but also observed consistent prior-year treatment with the same brokers. Given these factual gaps, ITAT directed the AO to examine broker statements/contract notes and other material and decide in accordance with law, treating the remand as in the interests of justice.
ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and remitted the matter to the file of the ld. AO for fresh adjudication on whether the derivative trades satisfy the conditions of Explanations 1 & 2 to s.43(5). The Tribunal noted absence of stamped contract notes and disputed broker account statements, lack of evidence that impounded digital copies contained complete contract notes, and unproduced s.133(6) enquiry results, but also observed consistent prior-year treatment with the same brokers. Given these factual gaps, ITAT directed the AO to examine broker statements/contract notes and other material and decide in accordance with law, treating the remand as in the interests of justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.