Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT allowed the appeal: the Revenue's addition under s.50C was rejected and the third proviso's 10% tolerance margin applies retrospectively, disallowing the technical argument that FMV determined by the DVO (versus stamp duty value) justified an uplift; the assessee's challenge on this ground succeeds. Separately, the Tribunal held the assessee entitled to deduction under s.54EC because actual reinvestment and return filing under s.139(1) were established; the claim may be recognized beyond the figures in the original computation as not barred by statute. Net result: impugned s.50C addition set aside and s.54EC relief allowed in favour of the assessee.
ITAT allowed the appeal: the Revenue's addition under s.50C was rejected and the third proviso's 10% tolerance margin applies retrospectively, disallowing the technical argument that FMV determined by the DVO (versus stamp duty value) justified an uplift; the assessee's challenge on this ground succeeds. Separately, the Tribunal held the assessee entitled to deduction under s.54EC because actual reinvestment and return filing under s.139(1) were established; the claim may be recognized beyond the figures in the original computation as not barred by statute. Net result: impugned s.50C addition set aside and s.54EC relief allowed in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.