Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The SC allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order dated 05.05.2021. The Court held that criminal courts are functus officio once a judgment or final order is signed and Section 362 CrPC bars alteration or review thereof except to correct clerical or arithmetical errors or where another statute expressly permits. A review petition filed under Order XLVII CPC in proceedings initiated under the CrPC was held not maintainable; the High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain such review. The attempted recall/review did not qualify as permissible "procedural review" nor raised any fresh, unheard matter, and thus the challenged High Court order was quashed.
The SC allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order dated 05.05.2021. The Court held that criminal courts are functus officio once a judgment or final order is signed and Section 362 CrPC bars alteration or review thereof except to correct clerical or arithmetical errors or where another statute expressly permits. A review petition filed under Order XLVII CPC in proceedings initiated under the CrPC was held not maintainable; the High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain such review. The attempted recall/review did not qualify as permissible "procedural review" nor raised any fresh, unheard matter, and thus the challenged High Court order was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.