Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT affirmed the AA's liquidation order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the Secured Creditor's interlocutory application for condonation of delay under Regulation 21A was rightly dismissed. The AA had relied on the CoC resolution contemporaneous with the liquidation order, and no timely communication was received from the Secured Creditor declining relinquishment of security; its first communication arrived belatedly. The Secured Creditor failed to prosecute or seek recall of the dismissal, and the Liquidator thereafter sold the secured assets and issued a sale certificate in favour of the purchaser. The Tribunal found no infirmity warranting interference and denied relief to the Appellant.
The NCLAT affirmed the AA's liquidation order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the Secured Creditor's interlocutory application for condonation of delay under Regulation 21A was rightly dismissed. The AA had relied on the CoC resolution contemporaneous with the liquidation order, and no timely communication was received from the Secured Creditor declining relinquishment of security; its first communication arrived belatedly. The Secured Creditor failed to prosecute or seek recall of the dismissal, and the Liquidator thereafter sold the secured assets and issued a sale certificate in favour of the purchaser. The Tribunal found no infirmity warranting interference and denied relief to the Appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
