Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The NCLAT affirmed the AA's liquidation order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the Secured Creditor's interlocutory application for condonation of delay under Regulation 21A was rightly dismissed. The AA had relied on the CoC resolution contemporaneous with the liquidation order, and no timely communication was received from the Secured Creditor declining relinquishment of security; its first communication arrived belatedly. The Secured Creditor failed to prosecute or seek recall of the dismissal, and the Liquidator thereafter sold the secured assets and issued a sale certificate in favour of the purchaser. The Tribunal found no infirmity warranting interference and denied relief to the Appellant.
The NCLAT affirmed the AA's liquidation order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the Secured Creditor's interlocutory application for condonation of delay under Regulation 21A was rightly dismissed. The AA had relied on the CoC resolution contemporaneous with the liquidation order, and no timely communication was received from the Secured Creditor declining relinquishment of security; its first communication arrived belatedly. The Secured Creditor failed to prosecute or seek recall of the dismissal, and the Liquidator thereafter sold the secured assets and issued a sale certificate in favour of the purchaser. The Tribunal found no infirmity warranting interference and denied relief to the Appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.