Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT dismissed all appeals, upholding attachment orders as the appellants were held to be in possession of proceeds of crime. The tribunal treated appellants' admissions and Section 50(2) witness statements as probative evidence of a fraudulent scheme siphoning bank funds, establishing that portions of the contested properties represented proceeds of crime. Claims that properties were acquired bona fide by registered sale deed failed for lack of disclosed lawful source of consideration. Allegations of procedural non-application of mind and non-involvement in the predicate offence were rejected as contrary to appellants' own admissions and the record. Consequently, the attachments stand and the appeals are dismissed.
The AT dismissed all appeals, upholding attachment orders as the appellants were held to be in possession of proceeds of crime. The tribunal treated appellants' admissions and Section 50(2) witness statements as probative evidence of a fraudulent scheme siphoning bank funds, establishing that portions of the contested properties represented proceeds of crime. Claims that properties were acquired bona fide by registered sale deed failed for lack of disclosed lawful source of consideration. Allegations of procedural non-application of mind and non-involvement in the predicate offence were rejected as contrary to appellants' own admissions and the record. Consequently, the attachments stand and the appeals are dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.