Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the provisional attachment under PMLA, holding the Special Court (PMLA) order non-final but not vitiated on the present record. The Tribunal found diversion of sanctioned loan proceeds constituted money laundering-inter alia a transfer of Rs.115 crore to a third party to prop up DHFL shares-and sustained attachment equivalent to the unpaid loan. The AT rejected the contention that initiation of NCLT/IBC proceedings and appointment of an IRP over a respondent's assets ousted PMLA action, reiterating that insolvency moratorium does not preclude criminal/asset-protection measures under the ECIR. All challenges to the attachment were found devoid of substance; appeal dismissed.
The AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the provisional attachment under PMLA, holding the Special Court (PMLA) order non-final but not vitiated on the present record. The Tribunal found diversion of sanctioned loan proceeds constituted money laundering-inter alia a transfer of Rs.115 crore to a third party to prop up DHFL shares-and sustained attachment equivalent to the unpaid loan. The AT rejected the contention that initiation of NCLT/IBC proceedings and appointment of an IRP over a respondent's assets ousted PMLA action, reiterating that insolvency moratorium does not preclude criminal/asset-protection measures under the ECIR. All challenges to the attachment were found devoid of substance; appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.