Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC remanded the matter to the appellate authority and directed that the respondent who admitted belated payment in Form GST-03 shall take steps to rectify the payment error with assistance from the other respondents. The appellate authority's recovery of Rs.1,67,974 from the petitioner's credit ledger is to be revisited, and any amount already recovered must be recredited to the petitioner's credit ledger within two weeks of communication of the order. The respondent remains statutorily liable to discharge CGST/IGST of Rs.139,380.48 and is directed to pay that sum unless already paid. The petition is disposed of.
HC remanded the matter to the appellate authority and directed that the respondent who admitted belated payment in Form GST-03 shall take steps to rectify the payment error with assistance from the other respondents. The appellate authority's recovery of Rs.1,67,974 from the petitioner's credit ledger is to be revisited, and any amount already recovered must be recredited to the petitioner's credit ledger within two weeks of communication of the order. The respondent remains statutorily liable to discharge CGST/IGST of Rs.139,380.48 and is directed to pay that sum unless already paid. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
