Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC remanded the matter to the appellate authority and directed that the respondent who admitted belated payment in Form GST-03 shall take steps to rectify the payment error with assistance from the other respondents. The appellate authority's recovery of Rs.1,67,974 from the petitioner's credit ledger is to be revisited, and any amount already recovered must be recredited to the petitioner's credit ledger within two weeks of communication of the order. The respondent remains statutorily liable to discharge CGST/IGST of Rs.139,380.48 and is directed to pay that sum unless already paid. The petition is disposed of.
HC remanded the matter to the appellate authority and directed that the respondent who admitted belated payment in Form GST-03 shall take steps to rectify the payment error with assistance from the other respondents. The appellate authority's recovery of Rs.1,67,974 from the petitioner's credit ledger is to be revisited, and any amount already recovered must be recredited to the petitioner's credit ledger within two weeks of communication of the order. The respondent remains statutorily liable to discharge CGST/IGST of Rs.139,380.48 and is directed to pay that sum unless already paid. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
