Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AAR held that the Applicant's voucher-collection activity, conducted via its Freedeem app and involving receipt of consideration on behalf of merchants, constitutes electronic commerce and renders the Applicant an e-commerce operator under the GST Act. The Applicant is not liable under reverse charge mechanism u/s 9(5) because its services are limited to voucher/coupon facilitation and collection and do not fall within the notified services under s.9(5). The Applicant is, however, required to collect TCS under s.52 on net taxable supplies collected through its platform and must obtain separate GST registration for TCS purposes in each State where supplies are effected. The question on TCS vis-Ã -vis payments to registered versus unregistered merchants was not adjudicated.
AAR held that the Applicant's voucher-collection activity, conducted via its Freedeem app and involving receipt of consideration on behalf of merchants, constitutes electronic commerce and renders the Applicant an e-commerce operator under the GST Act. The Applicant is not liable under reverse charge mechanism u/s 9(5) because its services are limited to voucher/coupon facilitation and collection and do not fall within the notified services under s.9(5). The Applicant is, however, required to collect TCS under s.52 on net taxable supplies collected through its platform and must obtain separate GST registration for TCS purposes in each State where supplies are effected. The question on TCS vis-Ã -vis payments to registered versus unregistered merchants was not adjudicated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.