Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that Articles 6 and 7 of the MLI cannot be invoked against the assessee for the relevant year due to absence of a Section 90(1) notification incorporating those provisions into the India-Ireland DTAA, and accordingly the Revenue's attempt to deny treaty benefits under the PPT fails. The assessee's valid TRC was treated as prima facie proof of residency not rebutted by cogent material. The Tribunal set aside findings characterising the leases as finance leases, holding they are dry operating leases, and concluded the assessee lacks a permanent establishment in India; Article 8 relief thus applies and the assessments rejecting treaty benefits were directed to be set aside.
ITAT held that Articles 6 and 7 of the MLI cannot be invoked against the assessee for the relevant year due to absence of a Section 90(1) notification incorporating those provisions into the India-Ireland DTAA, and accordingly the Revenue's attempt to deny treaty benefits under the PPT fails. The assessee's valid TRC was treated as prima facie proof of residency not rebutted by cogent material. The Tribunal set aside findings characterising the leases as finance leases, holding they are dry operating leases, and concluded the assessee lacks a permanent establishment in India; Article 8 relief thus applies and the assessments rejecting treaty benefits were directed to be set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.