Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that Articles 6 and 7 of the MLI cannot be invoked against the assessee for the relevant year due to absence of a Section 90(1) notification incorporating those provisions into the India-Ireland DTAA, and accordingly the Revenue's attempt to deny treaty benefits under the PPT fails. The assessee's valid TRC was treated as prima facie proof of residency not rebutted by cogent material. The Tribunal set aside findings characterising the leases as finance leases, holding they are dry operating leases, and concluded the assessee lacks a permanent establishment in India; Article 8 relief thus applies and the assessments rejecting treaty benefits were directed to be set aside.
ITAT held that Articles 6 and 7 of the MLI cannot be invoked against the assessee for the relevant year due to absence of a Section 90(1) notification incorporating those provisions into the India-Ireland DTAA, and accordingly the Revenue's attempt to deny treaty benefits under the PPT fails. The assessee's valid TRC was treated as prima facie proof of residency not rebutted by cogent material. The Tribunal set aside findings characterising the leases as finance leases, holding they are dry operating leases, and concluded the assessee lacks a permanent establishment in India; Article 8 relief thus applies and the assessments rejecting treaty benefits were directed to be set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.