Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT partly allowed the appeal of the assessee. The Tribunal restored transfer-pricing issues (grounds 4-11) to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) for reconsideration, holding that the CUP method's functional applicability required fresh scrutiny and could not be rejected summarily in favour of TNMM. The disallowance for interest on working-capital (grounds 12-12.2) was deleted and interest of Rs.17,57,358 allowed, the AO having taken an inconsistent stance vis-Ã -vis TPO findings. The CIT(A)'s direction to verify bad-debt admissibility was set aside. Miscellaneous expense disallowance (ground 14) was allowed; certain communication- and prior-period expense issues (grounds 15, 15.1 and 14-14.1) were remitted to the AO for verification.
The ITAT partly allowed the appeal of the assessee. The Tribunal restored transfer-pricing issues (grounds 4-11) to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) for reconsideration, holding that the CUP method's functional applicability required fresh scrutiny and could not be rejected summarily in favour of TNMM. The disallowance for interest on working-capital (grounds 12-12.2) was deleted and interest of Rs.17,57,358 allowed, the AO having taken an inconsistent stance vis-Ã -vis TPO findings. The CIT(A)'s direction to verify bad-debt admissibility was set aside. Miscellaneous expense disallowance (ground 14) was allowed; certain communication- and prior-period expense issues (grounds 15, 15.1 and 14-14.1) were remitted to the AO for verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.