Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of the impugned addition, holding that the assessee qualifies for deduction under s. 80IB(2). The Tribunal found the first limb satisfied, concluding the assessee was engaged in manufacturing activity despite revenue's characterization. The second limb was satisfied on the basis of the AO's remand report which categorically found use of new plant and machinery. The third limb-engagement of ten or more persons in the undertaking while using power-was held satisfied on the factual matrix, including the contractual arrangement for ancillary workers and maintenance of a specific wages register. The additions by the AO and confirmation by the CIT(A) were set aside and matter remitted for compliance with this direction.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed deletion of the impugned addition, holding that the assessee qualifies for deduction under s. 80IB(2). The Tribunal found the first limb satisfied, concluding the assessee was engaged in manufacturing activity despite revenue's characterization. The second limb was satisfied on the basis of the AO's remand report which categorically found use of new plant and machinery. The third limb-engagement of ten or more persons in the undertaking while using power-was held satisfied on the factual matrix, including the contractual arrangement for ancillary workers and maintenance of a specific wages register. The additions by the AO and confirmation by the CIT(A) were set aside and matter remitted for compliance with this direction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.