Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT affirmed that transfer pricing adjustment using CUP is permissible only for limited transactions (benchmarked at Rs.6.94 lakh) and upheld the assessee's use of TNMM for the remaining international sales (≈Rs.15.68 crore). Sundry amounts written back were held to form part of export profits and allowed for deduction under s.80HHC. Reliance on s.43A for denying depreciation was rejected and relief granted. Doubtful debts written off were allowed subject to audited book evidence of actual write-off. 60% depreciation on the software appliance and revenue treatment for software expenses were allowed. Sales-tax incentives could not be claimed in s.148 proceedings; merits reserved, but incentives held revenue in nature. MAT computation: full s.80HHC deduction to be given. Disallowance under r.8D/s.14A denied. Commission payment issue reopened for fresh AO adjudication. Cessation entries taxable only when written off; wind-mill depreciation fixed at 40%.
ITAT affirmed that transfer pricing adjustment using CUP is permissible only for limited transactions (benchmarked at Rs.6.94 lakh) and upheld the assessee's use of TNMM for the remaining international sales (≈Rs.15.68 crore). Sundry amounts written back were held to form part of export profits and allowed for deduction under s.80HHC. Reliance on s.43A for denying depreciation was rejected and relief granted. Doubtful debts written off were allowed subject to audited book evidence of actual write-off. 60% depreciation on the software appliance and revenue treatment for software expenses were allowed. Sales-tax incentives could not be claimed in s.148 proceedings; merits reserved, but incentives held revenue in nature. MAT computation: full s.80HHC deduction to be given. Disallowance under r.8D/s.14A denied. Commission payment issue reopened for fresh AO adjudication. Cessation entries taxable only when written off; wind-mill depreciation fixed at 40%.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
