Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT affirmed that transfer pricing adjustment using CUP is permissible only for limited transactions (benchmarked at Rs.6.94 lakh) and upheld the assessee's use of TNMM for the remaining international sales (≈Rs.15.68 crore). Sundry amounts written back were held to form part of export profits and allowed for deduction under s.80HHC. Reliance on s.43A for denying depreciation was rejected and relief granted. Doubtful debts written off were allowed subject to audited book evidence of actual write-off. 60% depreciation on the software appliance and revenue treatment for software expenses were allowed. Sales-tax incentives could not be claimed in s.148 proceedings; merits reserved, but incentives held revenue in nature. MAT computation: full s.80HHC deduction to be given. Disallowance under r.8D/s.14A denied. Commission payment issue reopened for fresh AO adjudication. Cessation entries taxable only when written off; wind-mill depreciation fixed at 40%.
ITAT affirmed that transfer pricing adjustment using CUP is permissible only for limited transactions (benchmarked at Rs.6.94 lakh) and upheld the assessee's use of TNMM for the remaining international sales (≈Rs.15.68 crore). Sundry amounts written back were held to form part of export profits and allowed for deduction under s.80HHC. Reliance on s.43A for denying depreciation was rejected and relief granted. Doubtful debts written off were allowed subject to audited book evidence of actual write-off. 60% depreciation on the software appliance and revenue treatment for software expenses were allowed. Sales-tax incentives could not be claimed in s.148 proceedings; merits reserved, but incentives held revenue in nature. MAT computation: full s.80HHC deduction to be given. Disallowance under r.8D/s.14A denied. Commission payment issue reopened for fresh AO adjudication. Cessation entries taxable only when written off; wind-mill depreciation fixed at 40%.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
