Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT set aside the impugned appellate order and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh quantification of the addition, directing recomputation in accordance with law after affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard. Tribunal held that, although approval under s.10(23C) existed, the assessee consciously elected to claim exemption under s.11 read with s.12A in the assessment proceedings and therefore CIT(A) erred in granting benefit under s.10(23C) which was not pleaded before the AO. The question of quantum of addition (previously disputed between specified amounts) is restored to the file of the AO for verification and determination consistent with this decision.
ITAT set aside the impugned appellate order and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh quantification of the addition, directing recomputation in accordance with law after affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard. Tribunal held that, although approval under s.10(23C) existed, the assessee consciously elected to claim exemption under s.11 read with s.12A in the assessment proceedings and therefore CIT(A) erred in granting benefit under s.10(23C) which was not pleaded before the AO. The question of quantum of addition (previously disputed between specified amounts) is restored to the file of the AO for verification and determination consistent with this decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.