Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders...
Preferential tariff benefit restored after Annexure-III rules upheld; no independent verification or fabrication found and uncorroborated intelligence insufficient
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders denying preferential tariff treatment under the FTA. The Tribunal found no evidence that the Department conducted independent verification to invalidate the Certificate of Origin issued by the competent Malaysian authority, nor any proof that the certificate was fabricated; consequently the claim under the Rules governing determination of origin in Annexure-III was held valid. Orders denying benefit solely on uncorroborated intelligence regarding failure to meet the 35% RVC threshold were unsustainable. The Tribunal also held the extended period of limitation inapplicable where only nondisclosure or misstatement was alleged. Benefit of notification granted to the appellant; appeal allowed.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders denying preferential tariff treatment under the FTA. The Tribunal found no evidence that the Department conducted independent verification to invalidate the Certificate of Origin issued by the competent Malaysian authority, nor any proof that the certificate was fabricated; consequently the claim under the Rules governing determination of origin in Annexure-III was held valid. Orders denying benefit solely on uncorroborated intelligence regarding failure to meet the 35% RVC threshold were unsustainable. The Tribunal also held the extended period of limitation inapplicable where only nondisclosure or misstatement was alleged. Benefit of notification granted to the appellant; appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.