Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders...
Preferential tariff benefit restored after Annexure-III rules upheld; no independent verification or fabrication found and uncorroborated intelligence insufficient
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders denying preferential tariff treatment under the FTA. The Tribunal found no evidence that the Department conducted independent verification to invalidate the Certificate of Origin issued by the competent Malaysian authority, nor any proof that the certificate was fabricated; consequently the claim under the Rules governing determination of origin in Annexure-III was held valid. Orders denying benefit solely on uncorroborated intelligence regarding failure to meet the 35% RVC threshold were unsustainable. The Tribunal also held the extended period of limitation inapplicable where only nondisclosure or misstatement was alleged. Benefit of notification granted to the appellant; appeal allowed.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders denying preferential tariff treatment under the FTA. The Tribunal found no evidence that the Department conducted independent verification to invalidate the Certificate of Origin issued by the competent Malaysian authority, nor any proof that the certificate was fabricated; consequently the claim under the Rules governing determination of origin in Annexure-III was held valid. Orders denying benefit solely on uncorroborated intelligence regarding failure to meet the 35% RVC threshold were unsustainable. The Tribunal also held the extended period of limitation inapplicable where only nondisclosure or misstatement was alleged. Benefit of notification granted to the appellant; appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.