Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
CESTAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant (a 100% EOU) unlawfully availed CENVAT credit on exempted services and failed to reverse the full ineligible credit by the prescribed date under Rule 6(3A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal affirmed that where common credit is used, reversal of the portion attributable to exempted services was required on or before 30 June of the relevant year, and delay attracts interest under Rule 6(3A). The appellant's partial reversal on 2 June 2009 and belated balance reversal on 30 September 2009 gave rise to interest liability from the stipulated date until actual reversal; the impugned order was accordingly upheld.
CESTAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant (a 100% EOU) unlawfully availed CENVAT credit on exempted services and failed to reverse the full ineligible credit by the prescribed date under Rule 6(3A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal affirmed that where common credit is used, reversal of the portion attributable to exempted services was required on or before 30 June of the relevant year, and delay attracts interest under Rule 6(3A). The appellant's partial reversal on 2 June 2009 and belated balance reversal on 30 September 2009 gave rise to interest liability from the stipulated date until actual reversal; the impugned order was accordingly upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
