Functional comparability governs selection of support-service and IT-enabled service comparables, with verification required for unresolved data and m...
Bank account freezing requires statutory authority; anti-money-laundering compliance and KYC monitoring do not permit unilateral indefinite restrictio...
The HC allowed the writ appeal, reversed the writ court's order and held the SVLDRS declaration and resultant discharge certificate void ab initio due to material misrepresentation: the declarant knowingly misclassified the matter as "voluntary disclosure" despite ongoing investigations, thus suppressing a material fact under the Scheme. The Court found investigation activity and statements recorded both before and after the declaration, reaffirmed Circular guidance requiring veracity, and determined departmental lapses in coordination did not cure non-disclosure. Consequentially the application under the Scheme is presumed never filed and the Designated Committee's issuance of Form SVLDRS-3 and the discharge certificate are set aside.
The HC allowed the writ appeal, reversed the writ court's order and held the SVLDRS declaration and resultant discharge certificate void ab initio due to material misrepresentation: the declarant knowingly misclassified the matter as "voluntary disclosure" despite ongoing investigations, thus suppressing a material fact under the Scheme. The Court found investigation activity and statements recorded both before and after the declaration, reaffirmed Circular guidance requiring veracity, and determined departmental lapses in coordination did not cure non-disclosure. Consequentially the application under the Scheme is presumed never filed and the Designated Committee's issuance of Form SVLDRS-3 and the discharge certificate are set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.