Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC held that the State tax authority possesses statutory power under the non-obstante provision of Section 44 to recover tax dues by attaching amounts owed to a dealer, which includes subsidy payments due to an industry under central industrial policies once those claims are processed, approved by the competent State Committees, sanctioned by the DIPP and released via the designated disbursing agency. The court construed "any person from whom any amount is due or may become due" and "any person who holds or may subsequently hold" to encompass persons holding sanctioned subsidy proceeds, enabling recovery forthwith upon such amounts becoming due or held. The writ petitions are disposed of.
HC held that the State tax authority possesses statutory power under the non-obstante provision of Section 44 to recover tax dues by attaching amounts owed to a dealer, which includes subsidy payments due to an industry under central industrial policies once those claims are processed, approved by the competent State Committees, sanctioned by the DIPP and released via the designated disbursing agency. The court construed "any person from whom any amount is due or may become due" and "any person who holds or may subsequently hold" to encompass persons holding sanctioned subsidy proceeds, enabling recovery forthwith upon such amounts becoming due or held. The writ petitions are disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
