Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
HC held that the State tax authority possesses statutory power under the non-obstante provision of Section 44 to recover tax dues by attaching amounts owed to a dealer, which includes subsidy payments due to an industry under central industrial policies once those claims are processed, approved by the competent State Committees, sanctioned by the DIPP and released via the designated disbursing agency. The court construed "any person from whom any amount is due or may become due" and "any person who holds or may subsequently hold" to encompass persons holding sanctioned subsidy proceeds, enabling recovery forthwith upon such amounts becoming due or held. The writ petitions are disposed of.
HC held that the State tax authority possesses statutory power under the non-obstante provision of Section 44 to recover tax dues by attaching amounts owed to a dealer, which includes subsidy payments due to an industry under central industrial policies once those claims are processed, approved by the competent State Committees, sanctioned by the DIPP and released via the designated disbursing agency. The court construed "any person from whom any amount is due or may become due" and "any person who holds or may subsequently hold" to encompass persons holding sanctioned subsidy proceeds, enabling recovery forthwith upon such amounts becoming due or held. The writ petitions are disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
