Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismisses the petition filed by the petitioner summarily for delay, holding that no substantive relief remains as explicit guidelines govern recovery of outstanding dues where first appeal has been disposed of until the Appellate Tribunal becomes operational. The Court reserves liberty for the petitioner to comply with Circular No. 224/18/2024-GST by filing an undertaking with the jurisdictional officer to institute an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal when it becomes operational within the time prescribed under Section 112 of the CGST Act and to remit the prescribed pre-deposit under Section 112(8) within 30 days of receipt of this order. Upon filing such undertaking, recovery of the remaining amount shall be stayed pursuant to Section 112(9). Petition disposed.
HC dismisses the petition filed by the petitioner summarily for delay, holding that no substantive relief remains as explicit guidelines govern recovery of outstanding dues where first appeal has been disposed of until the Appellate Tribunal becomes operational. The Court reserves liberty for the petitioner to comply with Circular No. 224/18/2024-GST by filing an undertaking with the jurisdictional officer to institute an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal when it becomes operational within the time prescribed under Section 112 of the CGST Act and to remit the prescribed pre-deposit under Section 112(8) within 30 days of receipt of this order. Upon filing such undertaking, recovery of the remaining amount shall be stayed pursuant to Section 112(9). Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
