Unregistered profit-sharing agreements cannot justify occupation of corporate debtor premises during CIRP; repossession by the Resolution Professional...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2981 to 3000 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC allowed condonation of a 26-day delay in filing the appeal, held that the Appellate Authority's summary rejection without affording a hearing violated principles of natural justice and statutory mandates under the Act of 2017 (notably the hearing requirement in Section 75(4) and the duty to pass reasoned orders under Section 107(12)). The HC set aside the impugned summary rejection of the appeal against the ex-parte demand order in Form GST DRC-07 relating to FY 2018-19, concluded there was no mala fide delay, and remitted the matter to the Appellate Authority to grant an opportunity of hearing and pass a fresh, speaking order. Petition disposed by remand.
HC allowed condonation of a 26-day delay in filing the appeal, held that the Appellate Authority's summary rejection without affording a hearing violated principles of natural justice and statutory mandates under the Act of 2017 (notably the hearing requirement in Section 75(4) and the duty to pass reasoned orders under Section 107(12)). The HC set aside the impugned summary rejection of the appeal against the ex-parte demand order in Form GST DRC-07 relating to FY 2018-19, concluded there was no mala fide delay, and remitted the matter to the Appellate Authority to grant an opportunity of hearing and pass a fresh, speaking order. Petition disposed by remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
