Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the Petitioner is entitled to refund of IGST paid on zero-rated exports notwithstanding a typographical error in the GST return. The court found it undisputed that the Petitioner exported goods and paid IGST of Rs. 9,48,549, and that Rule 96 of the GST Rules in conjunction with section 16 entitles the Petitioner to refund. The Respondent Customs erred in withholding the refund solely on account of a mismatch between GST return data and customs records, having disregarded the Petitioner's supporting representation and documents. Respondents were directed to sanction the IGST refund immediately with statutory interest from the date of the shipping bills until actual payment.
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the Petitioner is entitled to refund of IGST paid on zero-rated exports notwithstanding a typographical error in the GST return. The court found it undisputed that the Petitioner exported goods and paid IGST of Rs. 9,48,549, and that Rule 96 of the GST Rules in conjunction with section 16 entitles the Petitioner to refund. The Respondent Customs erred in withholding the refund solely on account of a mismatch between GST return data and customs records, having disregarded the Petitioner's supporting representation and documents. Respondents were directed to sanction the IGST refund immediately with statutory interest from the date of the shipping bills until actual payment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
