Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the Petitioner is entitled to refund of IGST paid on zero-rated exports notwithstanding a typographical error in the GST return. The court found it undisputed that the Petitioner exported goods and paid IGST of Rs. 9,48,549, and that Rule 96 of the GST Rules in conjunction with section 16 entitles the Petitioner to refund. The Respondent Customs erred in withholding the refund solely on account of a mismatch between GST return data and customs records, having disregarded the Petitioner's supporting representation and documents. Respondents were directed to sanction the IGST refund immediately with statutory interest from the date of the shipping bills until actual payment.
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the Petitioner is entitled to refund of IGST paid on zero-rated exports notwithstanding a typographical error in the GST return. The court found it undisputed that the Petitioner exported goods and paid IGST of Rs. 9,48,549, and that Rule 96 of the GST Rules in conjunction with section 16 entitles the Petitioner to refund. The Respondent Customs erred in withholding the refund solely on account of a mismatch between GST return data and customs records, having disregarded the Petitioner's supporting representation and documents. Respondents were directed to sanction the IGST refund immediately with statutory interest from the date of the shipping bills until actual payment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
