Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Employee conflict disclosures and investment restrictions expand with new recusal duties, post-employment limits, and compliance reporting requirement...
The HC quashed the impugned orders issued under Section 73(9) as...
Section 73(9) orders quashed-defective; attachments not valid show-cause notices; liberty to reinitiate under Section 73; exclusion under Section 73(10)
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The HC quashed the impugned orders issued under Section 73(9) as affected by procedural and technical infirmities, holding that attachments of tax determinations to summaries did not constitute valid show cause notices; however, in the interests of justice the court granted the revenue authorities liberty to initiate de novo proceedings under Section 73 for the relevant fiscal year. The HC directed that the period from issuance of the summaries to the petitioners until service of a certified copy of this judgment on the proper officer be excluded for computing the limitation under Section 73(10) of the Central Act and the corresponding State provision. The petition is disposed of.
The HC quashed the impugned orders issued under Section 73(9) as affected by procedural and technical infirmities, holding that attachments of tax determinations to summaries did not constitute valid show cause notices; however, in the interests of justice the court granted the revenue authorities liberty to initiate de novo proceedings under Section 73 for the relevant fiscal year. The HC directed that the period from issuance of the summaries to the petitioners until service of a certified copy of this judgment on the proper officer be excluded for computing the limitation under Section 73(10) of the Central Act and the corresponding State provision. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
