Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
661 to 680 of 95916 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed the impugned orders issued under Section 73(9) as...
Section 73(9) orders quashed-defective; attachments not valid show-cause notices; liberty to reinitiate under Section 73; exclusion under Section 73(10)
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The HC quashed the impugned orders issued under Section 73(9) as affected by procedural and technical infirmities, holding that attachments of tax determinations to summaries did not constitute valid show cause notices; however, in the interests of justice the court granted the revenue authorities liberty to initiate de novo proceedings under Section 73 for the relevant fiscal year. The HC directed that the period from issuance of the summaries to the petitioners until service of a certified copy of this judgment on the proper officer be excluded for computing the limitation under Section 73(10) of the Central Act and the corresponding State provision. The petition is disposed of.
The HC quashed the impugned orders issued under Section 73(9) as affected by procedural and technical infirmities, holding that attachments of tax determinations to summaries did not constitute valid show cause notices; however, in the interests of justice the court granted the revenue authorities liberty to initiate de novo proceedings under Section 73 for the relevant fiscal year. The HC directed that the period from issuance of the summaries to the petitioners until service of a certified copy of this judgment on the proper officer be excluded for computing the limitation under Section 73(10) of the Central Act and the corresponding State provision. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.