Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The HC quashed the impugned orders issued under Section 73(9) as...
Section 73(9) orders quashed-defective; attachments not valid show-cause notices; liberty to reinitiate under Section 73; exclusion under Section 73(10)
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The HC quashed the impugned orders issued under Section 73(9) as affected by procedural and technical infirmities, holding that attachments of tax determinations to summaries did not constitute valid show cause notices; however, in the interests of justice the court granted the revenue authorities liberty to initiate de novo proceedings under Section 73 for the relevant fiscal year. The HC directed that the period from issuance of the summaries to the petitioners until service of a certified copy of this judgment on the proper officer be excluded for computing the limitation under Section 73(10) of the Central Act and the corresponding State provision. The petition is disposed of.
The HC quashed the impugned orders issued under Section 73(9) as affected by procedural and technical infirmities, holding that attachments of tax determinations to summaries did not constitute valid show cause notices; however, in the interests of justice the court granted the revenue authorities liberty to initiate de novo proceedings under Section 73 for the relevant fiscal year. The HC directed that the period from issuance of the summaries to the petitioners until service of a certified copy of this judgment on the proper officer be excluded for computing the limitation under Section 73(10) of the Central Act and the corresponding State provision. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
