Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the disallowance of sums paid as "performance bonus" to director-shareholders was not sustainable. The Tribunal found that the directors constituted the principal technical and administrative resources, rendered special services that procured new orders, and that the bonus was objectively linked to duties performed and commercial objectives evidenced by the resolution dated 16.08.2016 and subsequent achievement of turnover. Consequently the payments qualified as deductible business expenditure, and the AO was directed to delete the addition; the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the disallowance of sums paid as "performance bonus" to director-shareholders was not sustainable. The Tribunal found that the directors constituted the principal technical and administrative resources, rendered special services that procured new orders, and that the bonus was objectively linked to duties performed and commercial objectives evidenced by the resolution dated 16.08.2016 and subsequent achievement of turnover. Consequently the payments qualified as deductible business expenditure, and the AO was directed to delete the addition; the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.