Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed the applicant's application for condonation of a 91-day delay in refiling the appeal. The Tribunal held that the applicant failed to plead any sufficient or reasonable cause-offering only vague allegations of logistical constraints and denial of deliberate delay-and thus did not meet the obligation to aver facts justifying the delay. While acknowledging that condonation in CIRP-related refilings may attract a more liberal approach given Section 12 timelines and the policy of timely resolution, NCLAT found no basis to exercise discretion in favour of the applicant. The condonation application is therefore rejected and the delay is not condoned.
NCLAT dismissed the applicant's application for condonation of a 91-day delay in refiling the appeal. The Tribunal held that the applicant failed to plead any sufficient or reasonable cause-offering only vague allegations of logistical constraints and denial of deliberate delay-and thus did not meet the obligation to aver facts justifying the delay. While acknowledging that condonation in CIRP-related refilings may attract a more liberal approach given Section 12 timelines and the policy of timely resolution, NCLAT found no basis to exercise discretion in favour of the applicant. The condonation application is therefore rejected and the delay is not condoned.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.